Legislature(2005 - 2006)HOUSE FINANCE 519
03/16/2006 01:30 PM House FINANCE
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB441 | |
SB157 | |
HB478 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ | HB 176 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | HB 271 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | HB 441 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | SB 157 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+= | HB 478 | TELECONFERENCED | |
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 157(FIN) "An Act relating to the maximum annual regulatory cost charge collected from certain regulated public utilities and pipeline carriers and to public utility liability associated with operating certain transmission lines under a Regulatory Commission of Alaska order for joint use and interconnection; and providing for an effective date." Representative Stoltze MOVED to ADOPT Work Draft 24- GS1138\I, Wayne, 3/8/06. There being NO OBJECTION, the Committee Substitute was ADOPTED. 1:57:24 PM KATE GIARD, CHAIR, REGULATORY COMMISSION OF ALASKA testified regarding the bill. She indicated that the bill would provide a funding mechanism for the purchase and implementation of data systems that would allow regulated utilities and pipeline companies in Alaska access to a secure web-based RCA portal, through which all day to day business transactions could be performed electronically. The project was valuated by a user utility committee and underwent a public process with the RCA in 2004/05, and is supported by utilities companies as a positive move for the regulatory environment in the State. She noted that the bill would increase utility cost for consumers by approximately $1 per year, since the costs were spread over a very large rate base. She requested that the Committee pass the legislation as a good policy for Alaska. Representative Hawker asked about the AIDEA receipts as a funding source. Ms. Gaird noted that these were actually Regulatory Cost Charge (RCC) receipts. Representative Hawker proposed that the fiscal note be changed to reflect the correction in the funding source. Vice-Chair Meyer opened the floor to public testimony. TED MONINSKI, DIRECTOR OF REGULARTORY AFFAIRS, ALASKA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, testified via teleconference. He noted that ACS was supportive of RCA plans to update its internal case management systems, and strongly supports its plans to create an electronic filing capability and enhanced searchable data system. 2:00:49 PM Mr. Moninski noted his experience in the field, representing public utilities before the RCA, and stressed the value of automating the operations of these agencies. He outlined ACS's experience with the Federal Communications System, implementing tools for efficiency such as its EDOC system and various searchable data bases. He proposed that such systems would ultimately pass benefits on to utility customers. 2:02:12 PM Mr. Moninski also expressed concern about whether certain modules of the system would not be implemented if not adequately funded. He noted the importance of such efficiency tools, while acknowledging the impact on consumers, and the importance to carefully evaluate any increased rates. ACS recommended that that Legislature and RCA work together to ensure a real rate of return on rate- payers' investment. He proposed that once the funding increased over a two year period - and stated support of an increase of the RCA cap to $1.9 for two years - it may generate an amount of funding that allowed consumers to be refunded rate increases. He urged legislators to consider this forward thinking legislation. 2:04:17 PM BILL SAUPE, AT&T ALASCOM, testified via teleconference. He stated that he has worked with the Anchorage law firm of Ashburn and Mason, representing utility companies before the RCA since 1985. He stated that AT&T Alascom believed that the proposed $3 million increase in the Regulatory Cost Charge was the most reasonable means to upgrade the RCA's computer systems. Mr. Saupe noted their understanding that the funds would be administered by a users committee, made up of a broad spectrum of utility industry and public interest representatives. The committee would work to create an improved computer system to allow for a searchable data base as well as other improvements to the agency's efficiency, and quality of its orders. He also surmised that it would save a great deal of money in terms of time savings. He raised concern that if implemented in stages, there was a risk that some aspects would not be completed. He also suggested that any surplus would be passed back to the consumers in savings. He proposed that they ensure that Regulatory Commission of Alaska increase be sufficient to provide adequate funding for the entire project developed by the user committee. 2:07:27 PM DAN DIECKGRAEFF, TREASURER AND MANAGER OF FINANCE AND RATES, ENSTAR NATIONAL GAS COMPANY, testified via teleconference. He noted his experience with the company and the spectrum of his company's service in Alaska. 2:09:21 PM Mr. Dieckgraeff stated that Enstar supported the RCA's initiative to update its information systems and to fund it with the proposed two-year limited increase in the RCC. He indicated the advantages for the utility companies, such as tracking of cases and cost of cases, making information available faster and easier, and savings in storage and filing. He concluded that it was important to his corporation that RCA have the necessary funding to complete all aspects of the project. 2:10:54 PM Mr. Dieckgraeff recounted a recently completed project during which historical information had been added into a data base, similar to the system proposed by the Commission. He stated his belief that this would be a very helpful system. 2:11:39 PM JIM POSEY, MANAGER, ANCHORAGE MUNICIPAL LIGHT AND POWER, ANCHORAGE, testified in support of the bill. He noted the complicated nature of dealings with the Commission in terms of filing documents and information. He confirmed that having a simultaneous filing of information would enable communication with regulators, noting that recent filing of information had decreased the amount of time spent in such endeavors. 2:14:43 PM JIM ROWE, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ALASKA TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION, testified via teleconference in support of the increase in the RCC charge for the reasons outlined by previous testimony. Mr. Rowe noted that in rural areas, the FCC electronic filing has saved a great deal of time. He suggested that for the Regulatory Commission of Alaska to have the same type of filing system would be of similar benefit. He noted that all of his directors supported the legislation for its potential increase in efficiency. He read a note from an employee with Matanuska Telephone Association. The letter expressed the lessening burden of filing through new FCC electronic system, but asked about the extent of document filing. Mr. Rowe concluded that such efficiency would pass along savings to customers. 2:18:23 PM Representative Stoltze asked whether there was a point when accumulated regulatory charges might comprise more than half of a service rate, and if in such cases this might represent a concern of public policy. Mr. Rowe acknowledged that half of the companies in his membership were cooperatives, and were experiencing a significant amount of service charges. He acknowledged that these breakout charges were not formerly seen on bills, but that total customer charges may not actually have increased. 2:19:36 PM He acknowledged that network access fees had been reduced recently at the request of cooperatives. He noted the perception that some local phone calls were "free", and that in fact charges were sometimes not what they appeared. 2:21:01 PM Representative Stoltze noted the improvements in phone charges. There being no further public testimony, Vice-Chair Meyer closed public testimony. Representative Kerttula asked regarding Sections 3 and 6 of the bill, regarding retroactivity and liability for damages. She wished to ensure that she did not have a conflict of interest, since her family had a current law suit pending. Ms. Gaird confirmed that the retroactivity only deals with damages after December 1, 2004. 2:22:40 PM Representative Kerttula asked if the state of Alaska would become liable if damages were awarded. Ms. Giard explained that the amendment resulted from a Regulatory Commission of Alaska order requiring MEA to provide service to the Alaska intertie in the Matanuska valley. She explained that the MEA was the only utility in this area using its own facilities to provide its own intertie service. The RCA ordered the utility to provide the service at 138 kilovolts, and the utility's design was for a lower power production level. She proposed that this section of the bill was in the public interest, because it exempts MEA from liability should any harm result from running the line at this reduced level. 2:24:23 PM Representative Kerttula followed up and Ms. Giard confirmed that the state of Alaska has assumed liability for any plaintiff damages. Representative Kertulla wished to ensure that no sovereign unity or waiver would be put forward. Ms. Giard noted that the bill had been evaluated by Legislative Budget and Audit and the Attorney General's office when it had been heard in Senate Finance the previous year. She noted that at that time, no discussion occurred around the possibility of a plaintiff not being able to seek recovery. 2:25:20 PM Representative Kerttula expressed her dissatisfaction with the directness of this response, and stated that she would follow up with the Attorney General's office. Representative Chenault asked if the Regulatory Commission of Alaska had already been out for bid on the project, and if the funds were truly adequate to provide the proposed system. Ms. Giard explained that that system was comprised of three primary components: first building the system core of an electronic case management system; a content management system which will maintain data for a goal of seven years, allowing companies to research data for that time; and the ability of the utilities and pipeline companies to use the web interface to file with the Regulatory Commission of Alaska and eliminate paper filing. 2:27:54 PM Ms. Giaird noted that she had originally estimated a $1.5 million budget on the project. She went on to explain that utilities during public process indicated that this was not sufficient. A utility user committee was formed, and a conceptual budgeting process ensued, developing a range of budgets between $890 thousand and $2.2 million. Within that process, the committee added the ability for companies to view old data, relying on pictures of data that had been taken in past years, something not included in the current funding. She noted that utilities had expressed a desire to compile historical information into searchable data. She reiterated that this historical research was not part of the currently proposed funding. In response to a follow up question by Representative Chenault, Ms. Giard confirmed that she was comfortable with the proposed funding level of $1.5 million to build the three-part core system. 2:30:36 PM Ms. Giard noted that the second phase of the project would require a range of $.5 million to $1.0 million to convert historical information into searchable data. She stated that this funding was contained in the version of the bill passed by the Senate Committee, but not in the current Committee Substitute. She stated that while there was every opportunity for utilities to return and request future increases of the RCC, it was not likely that the RCA would make such a request. 2:31:41 PM Representative Kelly speculated that a future request might be made for the second phase of the project. He pointed out that he had met with the Commissioner on this issue to ensure that future projects might receive consideration. He proposed that the project may then be extended if appropriate. Commissioner Giard stated that utilities would need to approach the legislature for such action, and noted that the RCA was scheduled to sunset, and would not be likely to ask the administration to sponsor a future bill. 2:33:18 PM Representative Foster MOVED to REPORT CS SB 157 out of Committee with individual recommendations and attached fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTIONS, it was so ordered. CSSB 157 (FIN) was REPORTED OUT of Committee with Individual Recommendations and one new fiscal note (HFC for DCED).
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|